Measuring AI-Q for Dummies

I’ve been intrigued lately by IQ and its effects on society. In particular, societal blocks: race, country, region, etc. I will tell you up front that asking questions about race and IQ is very, very racist but only when you are asking about the races that are on average less intelligent. There are no such issues when asking about a race with a high intelligence. So just keep that in mind while you read what follows and take time to mentally castigate me (and yourself if you agree) at the appropriate times.

First let’s talk about the Ashkenazi Jews. They are reported to have the highest average IQ in the world at ~110. There are two main reasons:

1. they historically have a high affinity for careers in finance and textual religious memorization/comprehension
2. genetics, specifically:
   • the founder effect
   • high consanguinity paired with highly lethal negative recessives

The first one should be self explanatory.

The second one isn’t that complex either but I’ll explain. AshJews began as a relatively small ethnic group who were already pretty cunning, sorry, I mean smart (wink wink). They were highly insular and intermarried extensively. This, of course, produces unwanted negative recessives but in their case, it actually served as a potent force multiplier for raising their average IQ over time because the negative recessives are so severe that those afflicted often do not survive childhood, and thus do not procreate.

Those who do not present the negative recessives DO get to inherit the high-IQ alleles and will later marry another high-IQ-allele AshJew like themselves. So only the healthy smart ones live and pass on their genes.

What’s more is that early in the AshJew history, the smartest (those who excelled at manipulating financial markets financial acumen) were rewarded with more opportunities to procreate than others.

And so we have a large cohort of self-appointed chosen ones that are on average a good bit smarter than the rest of the world. Maybe that’s why ON AVERAGE they’re so much better at national subversion than the rest of the world. We’re all just too stupid to notice or care. Hmm. I’ll have to notice better going forward.

Consequently, Arabs and other Middle Eastern ethnicities also have high consanguinity, but they experience the opposite effect because their negative recessives are far less lethal, which serves as the same kind of average IQ force multiplier as it does for AshJews, just in the opposite direction. If they were smart (see what I did there?) they’d drop the cousin and niece marriage crap and get civilized.

But the problem is they are ON AVERAGE too not-smart to stop and will likely to experience declining average IQ over time. At this point it’s so deeply baked in that I don’t know if you can stop it.

As an aside, did you know that during WW2 there was a campaign to mass sterilize the German people into extinction once the war was over? A Jewish man came up with a plan to snip every last German man and woman, boy and girl so they would be dead in a generation. FDR, who hated Germans virulently (and was a demon enfleshed if there ever was one), decided he’d rather run millions of the Germans through the meat grinder instead, along w several hundred thousand of our own, for no good reason.

I digress.

Now, going to the other IQ extreme we have blacks. In sub-Saharan Africa the average IQ is shockingly low, below what would be termed mental retardation. Or what I like to call “I’ll chew the bottle rather than twist the cap off” IQ level.

Now for all I know that’s a scripted video but there’s a reason most of Africa still languishes in poverty and I think low IQ is pretty much the reason why.

In the US, blacks are on average much smarter than African blacks but still a full standard deviation less smart than whites or asians. Again, on average is the key here. Individuals will present a wide range of variation. I know some really smart blacks and I’m sure you do as well. I also know some dumb-as-bricks whites. Doesn’t matter. We’re talking averages here.

The question is why is avg black IQ so low? And in case you want to know the answer, it is NOT genetics you racist pig! It is, in fact, cultural and/or environmental. You know, bad schools and what not.

On a totally unrelated note (I’m winking again) there was a study done to dispel the idea that low avg black IQ was in any way genetic. They found black children who were adopted at a young age by a stable white family and tested their intelligence around 6 years old. This group tested on par with a group of white children who had also been adopted young into similar homes. So there’s your proof, bigots! It’s not genetic.

They followed up when the children were adolescents and found that the black adoptees had reverted to the avg black IQ whereas the white adoptees stayed higher, around the avg white IQ. Well that’s pretty odd and kinda disproves the whole conclusion of the study but I’ll again say, it’s not genetic for blacks and you’re a racist for making me type that.

Well at any rate, this got me thinking about whether we could raise someone’s IQ but unfortunately, it appears that IQ is mostly determined genetically so the answer is not really. You can raise IQ a little by environmental efforts or cognitive training but really not that much. I mean except in the case of blacks of course. For them it is NOT due to genetics…they just need more damn money in the schools ok?

But seriously, how do fix a problem like this? The bulk of the answer is genetics and the AshJews have that science down to a T. They started smart and get smarter through…weak kids dying, which is terrible and sad but it’s just how their recessives work. The weak do not typically survive.

How could you make whites smarter, as an example? Let’s assume there’s a big prize if we can catch up w the AshJews and we all come together as whites to get it done. We want to be supreme! Wait, bad word choice. We just want to win.

What would it look like? I’m just being honest here but we’d have to tell the dumb ones they can’t have kids. I mean it’s really just that simple. Or we’d have to tell the smart ones they have to outproduce the dumb ones.

Or maybe you throw money at the dumb ones. “Hey trailer trash, I’ll give you $10k to get a hysterectomy!” Or if you want to get smart people to have more kids you let couples take a legit IQ test and if a married couple scores high enough you pay them a bonus for making smart babies.

Short of sterilizing the dummies, gene editing, or brain chips, good luck. Anything else you try ain’t gonna move that avg IQ needle much. That’s true for whites, asians, blacks, or anyone else. And I suspect that’s why brain chips are even a focus of our tech overlords. They know there’s no other realistic way to make us significantly smarter (if that one is even realistic).

Now to the real point of this post: I got curious about my own IQ so I took a couple online tests, which probably aren’t even accurate. If they are, I’ll just say I’m pulling my weight. If you’re looking to bring the white average up, you’re gonna need to look on the other side of the bell curve for help with that

Looking for a second opinion, I turned to AI and asked it to administer a 10-question IQ test. I gave it my answers and was informed I missed 3 out of 10, which seemed off to me. One was this:

Grok insists that A is the correct answer. The explanation: it’s a pattern of 3 where the final letter in the group is always i. They are asking for the next letter which is the 7th letter which is the first letter of the third group of 3. We don’t know what first or second position will be but that doesn’t matter according to Grok because all we need to know is the third position which so far has always been i. Therefore, the answer is i.

Surely you see the issue. Grok thinks the 7th position is the same thing as the 9th position. Of course, it “thinks” no such thing but assured me “The 7th term is the third in its group, so it’s I” even though the 7th term is the first one in its group of 3.

I really started to think maybe I was just too stupid to understand Grok’s reasoning but then Grok said I missed this question:

This one is pretty easy. The gap between each number goes up by 1 each time so the answer should obviously be 27, but that’s not an option. Maybe there’s a secondary pattern I missed? I never found one so I just guessed A. Per Grok:

“The next term should be 20 + 7 = 27. Since 27 isn’t listed, I’ll assume a typo in options. The closest logical progression (checking +8 for the next term) is 20 + 8 = 28, which fits option B.”

wut?

I pressed it for an explanation:

In other words, Grok can’t administer IQ tests, it can merely statistically MIMIC the administration of an IQ test, and not that well.

My sons and I did a group test later and the AI asked us to unscramble a word for the name of an animal. None of us could. The answer was “dolphin” except it wasn’t. Then it said the answer was elephant, which it also wasn’t.

I guess if blacks and hispanics are ever feeling bad (ON AVERAGE!) they should just compare themselves to AI-Q cuz that thing has gone full retard. And as we all know:

I think the current AI slop is soon to be fully exposed. It does have uses but it is fully derivative and wholly incapable of generative thought. It is all a probability matrix and all it “knows” is that, for example, a scramble of letters can be mimicked in such and such a way. One day the devs will add a line of code that says “hey retard, any time you create a scrambled word make sure it unscrambles to a word in this list” and link it to a dictionary.

But that won’t stop the errors.

You want to know where this is about to go? Here’s a hint: they have gone through Reddit, Wikipedia, probably all of social media, every digital book and email. What’s left to train it on? Nothing but it’s own derivation. All it can feed on now is new social content (which will only matter for news and buzzwords) and its own degenerate slop. AI will soon consume its own data feed and derive upon it’s own derivation ad nauseum like some digital human centipede (don’t Google that term, just trust me that it’s as gross as it sounds).

If AI is 95% accurate per derivation (generous if you ask me), what happens once it iterates upon that? Or said another way, what happens when you multiply .95 times .95?

So unless it’s now only, say, 80% accurate at mimicking us, the only way we haven’t seen the peak already is if they can raise that 80%. But either way, the AI ceiling ain’t far away. In fact, you could find its theoretical ceiling by having a conversation with an average-IQ human. Can you imagine assuming everything that person tells you is 100% correct?

And so I wonder, do stock market AI booms end in stock market AI busts? I wish I knew some AshJews that I could ask on average.